Saturday, January 21, 2012

FAA Final Rule on Pilot Fatigue



After reading the FAA press release, the key point that I believe will have the largest impact on safety in the industry is the 10-hour minimum rest period.  The new rule mandates that pilots must have an opportunity of eight hours of "uninterrupted" sleep.  This is a two-hour increase over old rules.  I believe this will have the largest impact on safety because pilots will be able to get an extra hour or 2 hours of extra sleep.  Pilots will now have the opportunity to wake up and maybe get a workout in or eat some food before they go on there day.  I work at a hotel and I see every morning pilots walking out the door with a cup a coffee and look half a sleep.  In my opinion there is nothing worst then waking up and knowing that you are going to be tired through out the day.  With this new rule, pilots will have the opportunity to get there full proper amount of sleep and wake up with the attitude of not being sleeping or fatigued.  


Previous regulations stated a minimum of 8-hours rest period, with this new regulation, it will increase the rest period by 2 hours.  Which doesn't sound much, but it also states that  pilots must have an opportunity for eight hours of uninterrupted sleep within the 10-hour rest period.  I'm sure every pilot is going to be absolutely thrilled that this new regulation passed!  


According to USA Today Travel the FAA estimates the change will cost the airlines nearly $300 million over 10 years.  An airline trades group estimates it could cost $2 billion more each year.  The second figure seems high in my mind, but the FAA estimate I totally agree with.  Due to the new regulations and preferably the 10-hour minimum rest will have airlines scattering to hire pilots, managers and dispatchers.  Due to this new regulation airlines will have to hire more pilots to fill in the slots of just the new 2 hour adjustment from the old regulation.  USA Today Travel also states that Pilots will be flying shorter routes to accommodate the new rules.  This is have a huge impact on the industry, but also very beneficial for future pilots.  Airlines will have to lower there minimums to get pilots hired in the next 2 years.


I agree with the exemption of cargo carriers from the new regulations.  If cargo carriers were covered in the new regulations all cargo carriers would go bankrupt and that would include UPS and FedEx.  Cargo carriers primarily fly at night and most of the time fly at the last minute.  The new regulations is huge with limiting pilots from back to back shifts from a night shift to a morning shift.  Cargo carriers would have to hire so many pilots in order to follow these regulations it would run them into the ground.  My solution to the fatigue issues that continue to exist within the cargo industry is to hire more pilots (not as much as airlines will require to) and implement the Fatigue Risk Management System so pilots are aware of there situation.  Instead of having them on call for 48 hours straight, limit it to a day at a time, improve there facilities, maybe put some beds where they can catch up on sleep at the facility instead of driving home.  I believe improving the facilities and not having the pilots on call for so long will improve safety and limit fatigue in the cargo industry.



4 comments:

  1. I agree that the new 10-hour minimum rest period is what would have the largest impact in terms of safety. And yes, even though an airline trade group says it could cost $2 billion more each year, I’d probably stick with the FAA's estimate of $300 million. With regards to cargo carriers, the article mentioned that some cargo airlines already improved their rest facilities for pilots to use while cargo is loaded and unloaded during night activities. So, most of the cargo carriers already improved their facilities. Just a note that you mentioned one of your solutions was to implement the FRMS, but the FRMS is what is costing $300 million (according to the FAA), though you mentioned at the beginning of the paragraph that you agreed with the exemption of cargo carriers (the exemption would be the exemption from FRMS). It'd be nice for the pilots if the cargo carriers opted in with FRMS (as the FAA suggests), but then the ensuing extreme costs would be incurred, and then all the subsequent financial problems for the cargo airline thereafter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice discussion. I particularly like how specific you are about a possible solution to the cargo situation. I do agree that perhaps a good compromise is limiting the time on call at a cargo carrier to something less than what it currently is.

      Delete
  2. As you mentioned I'm sure airlines pilots are splendid about the recent change and over the next two years I'm am excited to see the adjustments to the industry. I would have to agree with the 10 hour min rest as a major impact and really enjoyed your personal tie into the conversation "In my opinion there is nothing worst then waking up and knowing that you are going to be tired through out the day." Thats the truth. As far as the article link to USA travels, they reference the 2 billion dollar figure over 2 years in comparison to the FAA's 300 million over 10 years. I would like to see how the airlines trade group, Airlines for America, came up with this as an "accurate" figure. It may include some indirect factors the FAA didn't include in the initial markup. Although I agree its just a tad high I'd give them a chance to argue their point.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you for the minimum rest period is the most important, even though it is two hours, I believe the additional two hoursvwill account in the time it takes to arrive for duty as well as the time to get home. The time will also factor the time for you to eat and the time it takes your body to wind down to the state for you to begin your proper rest phase, and to believe that it will be uninterrupted.

    ReplyDelete